# Ongoing security testing

## Pentesting-as-a-Service for teams that ship continuously
Keep manual security testing aligned to your release cycle. We validate exploitable risk, help engineers fix it, and retest so evidence stays current.

### Security work that keeps moving
- **Cadence**: Monthly  
- **Scope**: Release + API  
- **Retest**: Included

### Current testing loop
- **Human validated**
- **Release auth changes Testing**
- **API object access Validated**
- **Retest payment fix Ready**

## Why it matters
### Annual testing does not match modern release cycles.
Most teams do not need a bigger PDF once a year. They need a dependable way to test what changed, validate real exploitability, fix quickly, and prove the loop is closed.

### Common triggers
- New customer-facing release  
- Enterprise security review  
- API or authentication change  
- Cloud or attack surface change

## What PTaaS covers
PTaaS works best when it is tied to recurring risk: releases, APIs, cloud exposure, and fix verification.

### Release testing
Focused manual testing for high-risk features before or after launch.
- New authentication, payment, admin, and data-access flows
- API changes, new integrations, and customer-facing releases
- Regression testing for previously sensitive areas

### Attack surface review
Recurring review of external assets, cloud exposure, and reachable services.
- New domains, services, endpoints, and infrastructure changes
- Cloud permissions, storage exposure, and management interfaces
- Manual validation of high-signal findings before escalation

### Remediation support
A lightweight operating loop for getting findings fixed and verified.
- Engineer-ready reproduction steps and practical fixes
- Slack or office-hours support for remediation questions
- Retest notes that show what changed and whether risk is closed

## Deliverables
The output should not be a dumping ground of scanner noise. PTaaS deliverables need to move remediation and prove progress.
- Testing plan and release-triggered scope
- Validated findings with evidence and reproduction steps
- Severity, exploitability, and business-impact notes
- Remediation guidance for engineering teams
- Retest results after fixes
- Customer- and audit-ready reporting summaries

## Process
A testing loop, not a one-time handoff.
1. **Plan the cadence**: Define target systems, release triggers, reporting expectations, and rules of engagement.
2. **Test what changed**: Manual testers focus on exploitable risk in the code, API, cloud, or workflow that actually moved.
3. **Route validated findings**: Provide concise evidence, severity, impact, reproduction steps, and remediation guidance.
4. **Retest and report**: Fixes are verified and the evidence trail stays current for customers, auditors, and leadership.

## Good fit
Use PTaaS when security needs to keep pace with delivery.
- You release meaningful product changes every month or faster.
- Customers ask for fresh testing evidence, not last year’s report.
- Your team needs help validating and retesting fixes.
- You want a repeatable testing motion without restarting procurement each time.

## Common questions
### PTaaS FAQ
- **How is PTaaS different from a traditional penetration test?**
- **Does PTaaS mean you are testing us 24/7?**
- **Who is a good fit for PTaaS?**
- **Will we still receive reports?**
- **Is this automated scanning or manual testing?**

## Expert Security Solutions
### Build a testing cadence that matches how you ship
Tell us what changes most often, what customers ask for, and where you need repeatable validation.